How does an individual typically behave when using an avoiding style in conflict?

How does an individual typically behave when using an avoiding style in conflict?

• A. They confront the issue directly
• B. They ignore the conflict altogether
• C. They give way to others' desires
• D. They assert their authority to resolve the situation

Answer: (B)

When an individual adopts an avoiding style in conflict, they typically choose to ignore the conflict altogether. This behavior reflects a desire to evade the discomfort associated with confrontation or resolution. Rather than addressing the issues at hand, they may withdraw from the situation, sidestepping discussions or decisions that could lead to conflict. The avoiding style is characterized by a lack of engagement in the conflict, which can lead to unresolved issues accumulating over time. Individuals using this style may believe that by avoiding the conflict, it will resolve itself or that the situation will improve without direct intervention. In scenarios where confrontation or asserting one's authority is required, an avoiding individual would not fulfill those roles, choosing instead to sidestep crucial discussions or decisions, thus creating a state of inertia regarding the conflict. This approach can sometimes prevent immediate tensions but may cause further complications in the long run, as underlying issues remain unaddressed.

When an individual adopts an avoiding style in conflict, they typically choose to ignore the conflict altogether. This behavior reflects a desire to evade the discomfort associated with confrontation or resolution. Rather than addressing the issues at hand, they may withdraw from the situation, sidestepping discussions or decisions that could lead to conflict.

The avoiding style is characterized by a lack of engagement in the conflict, which can lead to unresolved issues accumulating over time. Individuals using this style may believe that by avoiding the conflict, it will resolve itself or that the situation will improve without direct intervention.

In scenarios where confrontation or asserting one's authority is required, an avoiding individual would not fulfill those roles, choosing instead to sidestep crucial discussions or decisions, thus creating a state of inertia regarding the conflict. This approach can sometimes prevent immediate tensions but may cause further complications in the long run, as underlying issues remain unaddressed.